Editorial Policy

How we plan, write, review, and revise Selvora content โ€” and the claims we deliberately avoid.

Who writes Selvora content

Selvora is produced by a small editorial team. Quizzes, result descriptions, guide hubs, and essays are all written in-house. Each piece gets drafted, reviewed, and revised internally before it goes live โ€” and we keep updating content over time as feedback comes in and the topic itself shifts.

What we aim for

Our goal is content that helps people reflect on themselves with a little more language and a little more kindness. The voice we try to keep is warm but honest โ€” closer to a friend who has read a lot than a textbook or a one-way horoscope.

Claims we avoid

There are some kinds of claims we deliberately don't make. If you spot language that crosses these lines anywhere on Selvora, please treat it as a bug and let us know.

  • Clinical or medical diagnoses of the reader. Our quizzes don't diagnose depression, anxiety, ADHD, personality disorders, or any other condition.
  • Certified IQ scores. Our IQ quiz is a gamified estimate written for entertainment โ€” not comparable to instruments like WAIS or Stanfordโ€“Binet.
  • Predictions about the future. Our tarot and astrology content use traditional symbolic frameworks as a way to reflect โ€” not as a forecast.
  • Romantic compatibility guarantees. None of the sign pairings, type pairings, or attachment-style pairings we describe are predictive in any statistical sense.
  • Punching down on a group. We avoid language that mocks a personality type, sign, or style by treating the type itself as pathological.

How we cite traditions

When we lean on a framework โ€” MBTI, Enneagram, attachment theory, love languages, tarot symbolism, zodiac traditions โ€” we describe it as a tradition or framework, not as proven science. Where a distinction matters (Big Five vs. MBTI, for example), we try to spell it out inside the text instead of assuming the reader already knows the difference.

Review and revision

Quiz content gets reviewed for internal consistency before publishing. Long-form pieces get checked for tone, scope of claims, and reading flow. We go back and revise an existing page when:

  • A reader sends a specific correction we can verify.
  • Public understanding of a framework shifts and our copy starts reading dated.
  • A result description has accidentally reinforced a stereotype we want to avoid.
  • Reader behavior shows a systematic misunderstanding that a clearer page would clear up.

Advertising and editorial independence

Selvora shows Google AdSense ads on some pages. Ad placements stay separated from editorial content โ€” advertisers don't influence which quizzes we publish, what our result descriptions say, or which frameworks we cover. We don't take paid placement inside quizzes or result copy.

Korean and English are both first-class

We don't treat Korean as a short translation layer pasted on top of an English site. When a Korean page feels thinner after localization, we expand the Korean context itself instead of padding it with repeated labels. Both languages should read like they were written for that reader from the start.

Corrections policy

If you think a page has a factual error, an unfair generalization, or an accidental over-claim, please email us. We make substantive corrections directly on the page; for significant revisions we add a short note at the bottom of the article with the date and what changed.

How to reach us

The one contact we guarantee to read is yuseong2099@gmail.com. The Contact page lists what we can and can't help with.

For methodology โ€” how our quiz results are actually generated โ€” see the How Results Work page. For the editorial worldview behind our content choices, see Content Principles.